Chapter three of "The Curious Researcher" is a great aid to research. It continues in a more focused way, Chapter two's topic of researching one's topic. It really focuses on not only note taking but quoting and finding things easily.
It can be a difficult thing to take effective notes while reading through a source. Naturally, I want to just write down exactly what is written, no thought needed there. Ballenger expresses the danger of this. If we just write down whatever was written, we're not really understanding what we've read. To understand things, we must work through them in our minds (or on our paper) so when we write a rough draft, we aren't later lost in our own research notes.
This strategy of pondering with notes helped me get straight A's during Chemistry and Physics in high school, so I am more than happy to take notes when reading. Not only did it help me get good grades, but now I can simply review my notes and remember much of what I learned. This, I think, is the key to researching properly: to understand, not just to memorize. Something Bartholomae wrote about in "Ways of Reading."
Another great reason to take "pondering notes" is it can help prevent plagiarism, a very easy crime to commit.
Finding proper sources at the library and on the internet can be difficult. Sometimes, when a topic is too specific, the sources become too scarce. Ballenger addresses this in his last section. The librarian Terry who spoke on Friday was an amazing help with library research. She opened my eyes to the many tricks we can use to find our sources. Ballenger says that just broadening the topic a little may mean the difference of finding useful reference material.
I will certainly use these strategies in the future.
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Saturday, January 29, 2011
"Polygamy in America" an impression
Within the first paragraph, the author has drawn you in. Right away, I am filled with questions. Why are they gathering? What's the occasion? What's the purpose? This is a very affective way to open a paper. Something I'd like to emulate in my own.
Although the topic is a bit unusual, I enjoyed reading it. It is unusual in the fact that many people like to think polygamy is a small cult practice somewhere far from home, nothing to worry about. Really, as the author shows, there are very large groups from central to western US, and they aren't backing down.
As far as the author's writing style, I enjoyed that any time he opened a new topic, a question would develop in my mind. It would quickly --not too quickly-- be answered. This kept me steadily curious in this article.
Bartholomae
It took a little longer than I expected to finish the excerpt by Bartholomae. In this reading, the author is writing, I believe, the introduction for his entire work. Through examples from multiple essays, Bartholomae plans to guide his audience in methods of constructive reading.
I found this excerpt informative and full of useful examples -- plenty to read, for sure. Throughout his intro, Bartholomae brings up the point that it's more important to read for understanding than just memorize all the facts.
Many times we want to just memorize what we've researched and write it down in our paper. It doesn't matter if we understand it or not, just that we can recite it. Reading with pen and paper for notes can improve our understanding and memory of the books, articles, and such that we read for our research.
This excerpt was a little dry, but I really don't expect introductions to be gripping.
I found this excerpt informative and full of useful examples -- plenty to read, for sure. Throughout his intro, Bartholomae brings up the point that it's more important to read for understanding than just memorize all the facts.
Many times we want to just memorize what we've researched and write it down in our paper. It doesn't matter if we understand it or not, just that we can recite it. Reading with pen and paper for notes can improve our understanding and memory of the books, articles, and such that we read for our research.
This excerpt was a little dry, but I really don't expect introductions to be gripping.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Morning, before class
It's now almost 9 AM Friday morning. Class is starting soon, but I'd rather wait in the comfortable library. I've been pondering my topic a lot lately. At first, it was so difficult to narrow down my three topics, but now all is clear to me.
Unit 1 requires an exploratory essay. In Unit 3, I will be taking a stance and researching to support it. For a long time, I wondered how any of my topics could fit with both Units, but now I can.
My topic will focus on modern technology in exploration. In Unit 1, I will explore what new discoveries and technology is available to aid modern exploration, how it has helped, and what is expected in the near future. In Unit 3, I will take a stance on the controversial statement that modern technology is destroying modern exploration, and how. if it's true, it is doing so.
Unit 1 requires an exploratory essay. In Unit 3, I will be taking a stance and researching to support it. For a long time, I wondered how any of my topics could fit with both Units, but now I can.
My topic will focus on modern technology in exploration. In Unit 1, I will explore what new discoveries and technology is available to aid modern exploration, how it has helped, and what is expected in the near future. In Unit 3, I will take a stance on the controversial statement that modern technology is destroying modern exploration, and how. if it's true, it is doing so.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
"The Curious Researcher 2"
Part 1 of Chapter 2 in Ballenger's "Curious Researcher" expresses the pros and cons of both library research and internet research.
I've always preferred library research to internet research. One reason I do is due to the difficulty finding valid sources online or knowing which are invalid. Ballenger addresses this problem with helpful tips on refining keywords to produce a more focused search.
I agree that many students prefer online research to the library just because it is easier.
On my first library research day, I had trouble knowing where to start. There were so many books, and I was still unfamiliar with the organization. A librarian helped me get comfortable with the search engine for the library, and Ballenger enforced that knowledge with his book.
Now I feel a bit more confident searching for my topic.
I've always preferred library research to internet research. One reason I do is due to the difficulty finding valid sources online or knowing which are invalid. Ballenger addresses this problem with helpful tips on refining keywords to produce a more focused search.
I agree that many students prefer online research to the library just because it is easier.
On my first library research day, I had trouble knowing where to start. There were so many books, and I was still unfamiliar with the organization. A librarian helped me get comfortable with the search engine for the library, and Ballenger enforced that knowledge with his book.
Now I feel a bit more confident searching for my topic.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Research Wed 26 of January
This is great. I just found a book in the library entitled, "New Spaces of Exploration: Geographies of Discovery in the Twentieth Century." It sounds like a great first research on the subject of Modern Exploration. I'll have to check it out.
I found another one that may be useful. "Explorers: the Most Exciting Voyages of Discovery, from the African Expeditions to the Lunar Landing." This could be really useful in the research of modern explorers.
I'll also check out the National Geographic magazines they may have on modern exploration.
I found another one that may be useful. "Explorers: the Most Exciting Voyages of Discovery, from the African Expeditions to the Lunar Landing." This could be really useful in the research of modern explorers.
I'll also check out the National Geographic magazines they may have on modern exploration.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
"The Curious Researcher"
I really enjoyed reading the first chapter to "The Curious Researcher." It was very comprehensive and easy to read, so I had no difficulty learning a great deal.
This chapter really helped me with my topic. Before I read it, I barely had an idea of what to pursue, but now, I've been able to narrow it down, so I can prepare for Wednesday's statement.
Ballenger emphasized curiosity when researching -- very valuable advice. Since reading it, my curiosity on the subject of modern exploration has only increased, and it has been directed to three broad topics.
What kind of modern technology has helped us explore impossibly-difficult-to-explore places? Two places come to mind instantly: deep ocean and deep space. These two places have, for most of our history, been beyond reach, but thanks to our advances in technology, we can now investigate them a little further. What technology we use, how it has evolved, and how we can use it would be easily researchable.
Another question I've had is: Who are the explorers of today? We can all name explorers of the past. Leif Ericson, Christopher Columbus, David Livingstone, Captain James Cook, and John Muir popped into my mind without any research at all. Why can we do that with past explorers but not with modern ones? This would be an interesting topic to research.
Of course, there is also the controversial topic (kudos to Torii) that modern technology is actually killing exploration, since it has become so easy to just type the name of some ancient structure or some far off place in Google and find photos, research, and anything one would want to know. Most people don't need to explore anymore; we can just stay put and let eccentric people do the exploring.
All three questions Ballenger would, I believe, call researchable and interesting to our reader.
One great comfort he gave me in this chapter was that we don't have to find a topic and try to squeeze as much info as we can into it, which would have been my tendency. It is much more important to focus our paper on the most interesting and researchable to keep our audience captivated. This is what I hope to do.
This chapter really helped me with my topic. Before I read it, I barely had an idea of what to pursue, but now, I've been able to narrow it down, so I can prepare for Wednesday's statement.
Ballenger emphasized curiosity when researching -- very valuable advice. Since reading it, my curiosity on the subject of modern exploration has only increased, and it has been directed to three broad topics.
What kind of modern technology has helped us explore impossibly-difficult-to-explore places? Two places come to mind instantly: deep ocean and deep space. These two places have, for most of our history, been beyond reach, but thanks to our advances in technology, we can now investigate them a little further. What technology we use, how it has evolved, and how we can use it would be easily researchable.
Another question I've had is: Who are the explorers of today? We can all name explorers of the past. Leif Ericson, Christopher Columbus, David Livingstone, Captain James Cook, and John Muir popped into my mind without any research at all. Why can we do that with past explorers but not with modern ones? This would be an interesting topic to research.
Of course, there is also the controversial topic (kudos to Torii) that modern technology is actually killing exploration, since it has become so easy to just type the name of some ancient structure or some far off place in Google and find photos, research, and anything one would want to know. Most people don't need to explore anymore; we can just stay put and let eccentric people do the exploring.
All three questions Ballenger would, I believe, call researchable and interesting to our reader.
One great comfort he gave me in this chapter was that we don't have to find a topic and try to squeeze as much info as we can into it, which would have been my tendency. It is much more important to focus our paper on the most interesting and researchable to keep our audience captivated. This is what I hope to do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)